I just recorded a new episode of The Bigger Truth Show, and it’s one of the most important connective-tissue episodes I’ve done in a while.
I’m a little under the weather in this recording… but I powered through, because the last ~two weeks of developments are too consequential (and too coordinated) to ignore.
What this episode covers
1) Patrick Byrne publicly says he’s “CIA” — and it’s not just a throwaway claim
In the episode, I walk through the timeline starting around 1:00 a.m. on Monday, Dec. 8, when Byrne posts that he’s gotten “permission” to release something — and then, just hours later, appears on Emerald Robinson’s show to claim he’s a “Tier 1” intelligence asset who was elevated to something “higher” in 2010.
I break down why that “permission” detail matters… and why his own framing implicates something much bigger than “Byrne being Byrne.”
2) How this connects directly to Tina Peters
I make a clear, evidence-based case for why the Tina Peters story is routinely misrepresented to the public — including what she was convicted for versus the myth that she’s in prison “for looking at election data.”
I also explain why the way this case is being used is strategically useful for people who want Republicans to conclude:
“It’s all rigged. Voting doesn’t matter.”
That message is the poison.
3) The “Venezuela” narrative and why it’s being pushed now
I read and dissect Emerald Robinson’s long “children’s book” thread about the supposedly “stopped” 2024 steal involving Serbia servers, anonymous Bitcoin payments, whistleblowers in luxury hotels, and a heroic CIA-adjacent trio.
I’m not doing it to dunk for entertainment (though it’s absurd). I do it because it’s a live example of emotional manipulation dressed up as journalism — and I explain how that narrative is being used to push a much darker outcome: escalation toward war.
4) The Michigan parallel: “Stephanie Scott” and the repeatable pattern
I flag what looks like the next attempted “martyr pipeline” in Michigan, where the story structure and cast of characters rhyme with Tina Peters in ways that should make every serious conservative stop and think.
The core argument of the episode
This isn’t about personalities. It’s about operations: recurring tactics, recycled narratives, and predictable outcomes that keep producing the same two results:
Destroy trust in elections and courts (especially among Republicans).
Drive escalation—socially and geopolitically—using fear and certainty without evidence.
How you can help
I’m working on something directly related to this (and to Tina Peters). I’m not ready to share details yet, but I can tell you this: it’s serious, it’s real work, and it’s going to cost money.
If my reporting has ever helped you make sense of the chaos, this is a great moment to support it:
Subscribe to BiggerTruthMedia.com
If you’re already a subscriber, gift a subscription to someone who wants the truth behind the narratives (Christmas is a perfect excuse).
Listen now
If you’ve been trying to understand how Byrne → Flynn → Tina Peters → “Venezuela” became one continuous storyline, this episode lays it out, step-by-step, in plain English.
Strap in. There’s a lot here.
