Thank you Scott for this important reporting and recap! You have been 100% correct all along and deserve the vindication. I saw the Flynntard dishonesty years ago too and you were the main journalist tracking it. I don't understand how so many people fall for that shit.
I've followed for a long time now, and it took awhile to see just how bizarre and dishonest your analysis of Patrick Brynes, David Clements, and yes, your nemesis General Flynn. General Flynn ran his own psyop, but it was a blundering one to say the least. His connections with Russia were designed to realign with the U.S., to counter the CCP and their far greater threats to American sovereignty, and the geopolitical war in the ME. Fortunately, the Iranian war has been a brilliantly executed conflict. But given your sloppy analysis of the election machine fraud, you can no longer be counted on for anything worthwhile. Whether you are incompetent, or subscribe to bizarre cult theories, is irrelevant to me. Here is the cult phenomena I refer to: Snake Oil Propaganda Fraud Scott McMahan of Bigger Truth Has Dark Cult-Filled & Dishonest Past: https://www.brianference.com/snake-oil-propaganda-fraud-scott-mcmahan-of-bigger-truth-dark-dishonest-past/
For the remainder of election fraud evidence, the entire narrative can be examined for others to benefit from: CIA case officer Gary Berntsen explains the stolen election process
by foreign governments starting at the 53min timestamp below.
Trump To Unveil Evidence of Voter Fraud LIVE to Nation as Joe Rogan SNAPS: Elections ‘Are STOLEN!’ (starts at the 53min timestamp)
Interview: Unregistered 172: David Clements (start at the 43min timestamp for why the Federal Courts won't accept "legal standing" on exposing the fraud) David explains why the judges determine there is "no legal standing" to bring cases of election fraud.
Sacrificing Election Confidence to Protect “Insiders” w/ Robert Barnes (start at the 11min thru 34mins timestamp for courts not adjudicating and following due process because the courts don't want to jeopardize the perception of the "integrity" for our voting machines (and other traditional forms of ballot issues such as signature fraud, fake addresses, et al ), or even the Judiciary, which are now in total disarray because they won't give "standing" to obvious cases of overwhelming evidence of voter fraud.
I have no skin in the game, other than the evidence I followed for the last five years. I just gave you overwhelming evidence, and the sources are solid (except for General Flynn). They’ve been challenged every step of the way, and they’ve answered every question. The only problem they have now are the federal courts, and to give their discovery “standing” in the courts will be disastrous for them, and they know it. That’s why it’s so difficult to prove there case, despite the overwhelming evidence. I also know Patrick Byrnes & David Clements have sacrifice so much, and Patrick has spent most of his fortune fighting for this cause he believes in. If you’ve seen his documentaries, you would know more about it. And of course, Patrick is dying of cancer… He’s been struggling with it since his early 20s. I also know more about your background, and it most certainly doesn’t look good for you at all… certainly not someone I would trust, despite your talent that appears to be wasted. And you obviously have skin in this game, since I’ve already seen your interviews and opinions. My only interest is in the truth, and saving our country from those who steal elections - which Patrick Byrnes, along with the CIA whistleblower, have explained in great detail - despite all the credible death threats. If for some bizarre reason, they are unable to do so, then I’m afraid our republic likely won’t survive. But at least I’ll know why - and so will many others that have examined the same evidence I have.
Thank you Scott for this important reporting and recap! You have been 100% correct all along and deserve the vindication. I saw the Flynntard dishonesty years ago too and you were the main journalist tracking it. I don't understand how so many people fall for that shit.
I've followed for a long time now, and it took awhile to see just how bizarre and dishonest your analysis of Patrick Brynes, David Clements, and yes, your nemesis General Flynn. General Flynn ran his own psyop, but it was a blundering one to say the least. His connections with Russia were designed to realign with the U.S., to counter the CCP and their far greater threats to American sovereignty, and the geopolitical war in the ME. Fortunately, the Iranian war has been a brilliantly executed conflict. But given your sloppy analysis of the election machine fraud, you can no longer be counted on for anything worthwhile. Whether you are incompetent, or subscribe to bizarre cult theories, is irrelevant to me. Here is the cult phenomena I refer to: Snake Oil Propaganda Fraud Scott McMahan of Bigger Truth Has Dark Cult-Filled & Dishonest Past: https://www.brianference.com/snake-oil-propaganda-fraud-scott-mcmahan-of-bigger-truth-dark-dishonest-past/
For the remainder of election fraud evidence, the entire narrative can be examined for others to benefit from: CIA case officer Gary Berntsen explains the stolen election process
by foreign governments starting at the 53min timestamp below.
Trump To Unveil Evidence of Voter Fraud LIVE to Nation as Joe Rogan SNAPS: Elections ‘Are STOLEN!’ (starts at the 53min timestamp)
https://www.youtube.com/live/7jDaeKomaIg?si=26VQ9ssSjr1yuFmz&t=3193
For a partial collection of links and interviews on proof of the stolen election I assembled the past 5 years
The Cuban-Venezuelan Conquest of the United States of America
https://www.deepcapture.com/2024/10/the-cuban-venezuelan-conquest-of-the-united-states-of-america/
Interview: Unregistered 172: David Clements (start at the 43min timestamp for why the Federal Courts won't accept "legal standing" on exposing the fraud) David explains why the judges determine there is "no legal standing" to bring cases of election fraud.
https://youtu.be/jXT1-YH2gzU?si=LZqRl_iNLKzD5xJS
Sacrificing Election Confidence to Protect “Insiders” w/ Robert Barnes (start at the 11min thru 34mins timestamp for courts not adjudicating and following due process because the courts don't want to jeopardize the perception of the "integrity" for our voting machines (and other traditional forms of ballot issues such as signature fraud, fake addresses, et al ), or even the Judiciary, which are now in total disarray because they won't give "standing" to obvious cases of overwhelming evidence of voter fraud.
https://youtu.be/K14h7tj2ijE?si=-0gZIB80UINCCCVF
Cleta Michell website: https://whoscounting.us/legislative-resource-library/
"What Do We Need To Know About Dominion Voting Systems?" John Cullen Investigates
https://www.youtube.com/live/7Ojhk6Ne5aA?si=0aEiGTLWIWKIMkgP
Start at the 21min 39min mark, or the 22min mark to find out what Kristina said about
Scott McMann. - Gman
Prof. David Clements | Get Behind Me Satan | Episode 002
https://rumble.com/v6tea67-prof.-david-clements-get-behind-me-satan-episode-002.html?start=1299
https://electionfraud20.org/in-detail/cyber-symposium/david-clements-vote-trafficking-parable/
The massive cover-up of a traitorous crime
https://defendingtherepublic.substack.com/p/the-massive-cover-up-of-a-traitorous?r=bn1jr&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
So you think I'm dishonest because you disagree with me and the evidence you think their right is their own words.
You are not applying logic. You are applying personal bias.
If you were an honest researcher you would start by challenging your own assumptions.
I have no skin in the game, other than the evidence I followed for the last five years. I just gave you overwhelming evidence, and the sources are solid (except for General Flynn). They’ve been challenged every step of the way, and they’ve answered every question. The only problem they have now are the federal courts, and to give their discovery “standing” in the courts will be disastrous for them, and they know it. That’s why it’s so difficult to prove there case, despite the overwhelming evidence. I also know Patrick Byrnes & David Clements have sacrifice so much, and Patrick has spent most of his fortune fighting for this cause he believes in. If you’ve seen his documentaries, you would know more about it. And of course, Patrick is dying of cancer… He’s been struggling with it since his early 20s. I also know more about your background, and it most certainly doesn’t look good for you at all… certainly not someone I would trust, despite your talent that appears to be wasted. And you obviously have skin in this game, since I’ve already seen your interviews and opinions. My only interest is in the truth, and saving our country from those who steal elections - which Patrick Byrnes, along with the CIA whistleblower, have explained in great detail - despite all the credible death threats. If for some bizarre reason, they are unable to do so, then I’m afraid our republic likely won’t survive. But at least I’ll know why - and so will many others that have examined the same evidence I have.